<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Loftgardens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loftgardens.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loftgardens.com</link>
	<description>Greening the urban environment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:17:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Curb Rental Vacancy Rates with Curb Appeal by LeadingLandlord</title>
		<link>http://www.loftgardens.com/2011/09/26/curb-rental-vacancy-rates-with-curb-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>LeadingLandlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loftgardens.com/?p=94#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Ed, you are absolutely correct.  Attracting and keeping qualified tenants does wonders for a landlord&#039;s cashflow.  The steady cashflow improves the property&#039;s NOI and increases it&#039;s cap rate property value as well.  But, besides the finances, nicer looking properties with happy tenants take much less time and effort to manage.  It&#039;s the only way to roll.  A cleverly designed landscape plan pays dividends in time and money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed, you are absolutely correct.  Attracting and keeping qualified tenants does wonders for a landlord&#8217;s cashflow.  The steady cashflow improves the property&#8217;s NOI and increases it&#8217;s cap rate property value as well.  But, besides the finances, nicer looking properties with happy tenants take much less time and effort to manage.  It&#8217;s the only way to roll.  A cleverly designed landscape plan pays dividends in time and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solar bottle light bulb is brilliant! by LeadingLandlord.com</title>
		<link>http://www.loftgardens.com/2011/09/17/solar-bottle-light-bulb-is-brilliant/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>LeadingLandlord.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loftgardens.com/?p=89#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ed for turning me on to this.  Nice post.  What an innonvative idea with a huge impact.  I&#039;ll spare you the &quot;bright idea&quot; joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ed for turning me on to this.  Nice post.  What an innonvative idea with a huge impact.  I&#8217;ll spare you the &#8220;bright idea&#8221; joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sun versus shade by Gerard</title>
		<link>http://www.loftgardens.com/2010/07/26/sun-versus-shade/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loftgardens.com/?p=20#comment-74</guid>
		<description>This is all exactly on-point, but there&#039;s a sneaky gotcha here too: SMUD &amp; PG&amp;E both have the same problem with major distributed power generation - the transmission grid is simply not adequate to receive all that power flowing from enduser type connections. 

It&#039;s a sad fact, but to have the capacity to handle real distributed generation, all the electrical utilities would need to invest a considerable chunk into their infrastructure - we, as consumers, should have demanded they do this long before now simply as part of the cost of doing business, but we&#039;ve not done this, and without some specific incentive, they either won&#039;t, or will insist they have to &quot;pass that cost along&quot; regardless of record profits in their sector for almost a decade.

I have a friend who&#039;s a high-level solar infrastructure engineer, and he assessed the who greater bay area for this very question, and found that the needed infrastructure upgrades were in the tens of millions of dollars to low hundreds range, depending on how far out the improvements were pushed.

I think that we, as Californian ratepayers, should DEMAND that any electrical utility should commence such upgrades immediately. Who&#039;s on board?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all exactly on-point, but there&#8217;s a sneaky gotcha here too: SMUD &amp; PG&amp;E both have the same problem with major distributed power generation &#8211; the transmission grid is simply not adequate to receive all that power flowing from enduser type connections. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad fact, but to have the capacity to handle real distributed generation, all the electrical utilities would need to invest a considerable chunk into their infrastructure &#8211; we, as consumers, should have demanded they do this long before now simply as part of the cost of doing business, but we&#8217;ve not done this, and without some specific incentive, they either won&#8217;t, or will insist they have to &#8220;pass that cost along&#8221; regardless of record profits in their sector for almost a decade.</p>
<p>I have a friend who&#8217;s a high-level solar infrastructure engineer, and he assessed the who greater bay area for this very question, and found that the needed infrastructure upgrades were in the tens of millions of dollars to low hundreds range, depending on how far out the improvements were pushed.</p>
<p>I think that we, as Californian ratepayers, should DEMAND that any electrical utility should commence such upgrades immediately. Who&#8217;s on board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

